U.S. Urges U.N. Nuclear Inspectors on Iran

New York Times:

WASHINGTON — President Obama is pressing United Nations nuclear inspectors to release classified intelligence information showing that Iran is designing and experimenting with nuclear weapons technology. The president’s push is part of a larger American effort to further isolate and increase pressure on Iran after accusing it of a plot to assassinate Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the United States.

If the United Nations’ watchdog group agrees to publicize the evidence, including new data from recent months, it would almost certainly revive a debate that has been dormant during the Arab Spring about how aggressively the United States and its allies, including Israel, should move to halt Iran’s suspected weapons program.

Over the longer term, several senior Obama administration officials said in interviews, they are mulling a ban on financial transactions with Iran’s central bank — a move that has been opposed by China and other Asian nations. Also being considered is an expansion of the ban on the purchase of petroleum products sold by companies controlled by the country’s elite military force, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.

The Revolutionary Guards are also believed to oversee the military side of the nuclear program, and they are the parent of the Quds Force, which Washington has accused of directing the assassination plot.

The proposed sanctions come as administration officials confront skepticism around the world about their allegations that Iran was behind the plot and limited options about what they can do — as well as growing pressure from Republicans and some Democrats in Congress to take tougher action against Iran, with the central bank and the oil industry high on lawmakers’ lists.

The Israel Awareness Commission has helped push for tougher sanctions against Iran, and while current sanctions do indeed exist, they are not implemented to the fullest extent.  It seem as though this is changing rapidly.

Read the rest here.

IAEA General Conference 2011

INSS:

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) General Conference convened on

September 19, 2011 in Vienna for its annual meeting. Common to these conferences is the

injection of politics into the discussions, i.e., proposals by the Arab nations, headed by

Egypt, concerning Israel’s nuclear capabilities. Egypt views the annual conference as a

proper forum for advancing its efforts to dismantle these alleged capabilities.

In this sense, this year’s conference was no different from its predecessors. Two draft

resolutions relating to Israel were proposed: “Israel’s Nuclear Capabilities,” and

“Application of IAEA Safeguards in the Middle East.” Advance diplomatic activity by

Arab states focused especially on obtaining support for the first resolution. In the last two

years, this resolution has become the primary battleground between Israel and the Arab

states and the yardstick for judging the success or failure of Israeli diplomacy. Behind this

year's intensive diplomatic efforts conducted by both sides lay the Arab failure in last

year’s vote on the proposal (51-46). Thus, the Arab effort focused on an attempt to

generate a change in the balance of power, while the Israeli effort (with

American/European assistance) aimed to repeat last year’s success. In the end, estimating

that they would not be able to guarantee a majority in the conference plenum, the Arab

nations decided to withdraw the draft resolution.

How can the fact that Israel and its allies scored a diplomatic coup in such a hostile arena

for the second straight year be explained? Does this indicate a new trend whereby most

members are no longer willing to support the Arabs singling out Israel for its nuclear

activities? Hovering in the background of the General Conference discussions and the

addresses by many of the Arab speakers were the IAEA Forum scheduled for November

and the conference on a WMD-free zone in the Middle East scheduled for 2012, decided

on at the 2010 NPT Review Conference. Do the results of the IAEA General Conference

impact on the two forthcoming gatherings, and if so, how?

Some would explain the Arab failure by the difficulty in agreeing on a uniform stance andinadequate inter-Arab coordination, apparently in light of the Arab spring, which deflected the attention of the Arab nations towards what they regarded as more urgent issues. In

addition, Israel’s success may be attributed to an improved diplomatic campaign and

better coordination with the United States and European Union member nations. The latter

focused on the negative contribution that would be made by a resolution singling out

Israel, given the effort to build an atmosphere of trust on the eve of the IAEA Forum

Conference and the efforts to convene the 2012 conference. In this context, the EU was

able to point to the success of the seminar it held this past July in Brussels. Thus unlike in

2010, once the Arab nations understood that they had no chance to win a vote, they

decided to withdraw the resolution, thereby sparing themselves a second straight loss.

They explained their decision not to bring the resolution to a vote as a goodwill gesture in

the context of the IAEA Conference and the related events.

Read the full report here.

While it's great that their resolution to single out Israel on the basis of anti-Semitism, bias, and lies, this is a clear example of how the Arab states hold a majority in the U.N. and U.N. affiliated organizations and are thus able to condemn and condemn and condemn Israel for absolutely no reason.  You can't take them seriously.

This shouldn't be allowed in the first place.  Something needs to be done.  The U.N. has lost all legitimacy - it's about time they regain some.