The real reason why Israel is isolated

From The Jewish Week:

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta was quite right to observe this week that Israel is becoming increasingly isolated in the Mideast. What’s unnerving, though, is to suggest, as he did, that Jerusalem is at fault for this situation.

“Real security can only be achieved by both a strong diplomatic effort as well as a strong effort to project your military strength,” Panetta said en route to the region for the umpteenth U.S. effort to restart peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians.

We appreciate and support Washington’s attempts to get the negotiations on track. The current urgency is driven by the Palestinian Authority’s end-around diplomacy at the United Nations in its quest for statehood by avoiding rather than dealing with Israel. But a reality check is in order, and it indicates that Jerusalem is not the culprit here. Far from it.

In truth, Israel has accepted the Quartet’s invitation to come back to the table, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said repeatedly that he is ready to sit down and negotiate with PA President Mahmoud Abbas immediately.

It is Abbas who is holding back, as usual, insisting that Israel first must agree to a moratorium on settlement building. Netanyahu’s response is, in effect, “been there, done that.” He points out that at some internal political risk, the Jerusalem government declared a 10-month halt to building in the West Bank, but the Palestinians dragged their feet for nine months and the talks ended after two weeks.

We would prefer that Netanyahu issue another short-term moratorium on West Bank building — if for no other reason than tactical. Such a move might score a few diplomatic points with Washington and a few other countries. More importantly, though, it would reveal that the sticking point for the Palestinians is not the settlements. After all, the PA negotiated off and on with Jerusalem for many years without raising the issue, and only made it a deal-breaker after President Barack Obama did.

Rather, the critical considerations for the leaders of the PA, as Abbas noted in his UN speech last month, are that they believe the “occupation” goes back to the creation of the State of Israel in 1948, not 1967, and their refusal to recognize Israel as a Jewish state or compromise on the “right of return.”

In all the calls for a Palestinian state, how many have noted that it would have racist, apartheid laws — no Jews allowed — and follow Islamic dictates? Not to mention that the PA is financially broke, has deep divisions with Hamas in Gaza and can’t control militants without the help of the Israeli army.

Yes, Israel finds itself isolated in the region. That’s because Turkey has cast its fate with Iran rather than the West and has been looking for fights to pick with Jerusalem to bolster its status in Tehran. It’s because Egypt, without Mubarak, has made it clear that it wants to pull back the relationship. Israel displayed great restraint in the face of border attacks and having its embassy in Cairo attacked by a lynch mob.

Yet Jerusalem is somehow perceived as causing rather than enduring increasing hostility and snubs from its neighbors.

Are the West Bank settlements really to blame here rather than decades of virulent Arab anti-Semitism and refusal to accept the reality of a Jewish presence in the region?

Panetta's Pointless Warning to Israel

Jonothan S. Tobin of Commentary Magazine:

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta warned Israel yesterday that its increasing isolation in the region means it must take “risks for peace.” This shot fired over the bow of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu was made in comments to reporters traveling with Panetta, who is on his first trip to the Jewish state since assuming the leadership of the Pentagon.

But it is not likely to make much of an impression with the Israeli people for the simple reason that, unlike either the Obama administration and the international press corps, they understand Israel has been taking risks for peace for 18 years. Panetta’s statement, like so much of the rhetoric that has come out of the administration, seems to reflect a mindset that treats the events of the last 18 years as meaningless.

After the Oslo Accords, the peace offers that both Yasir Arafat​ and Mahmoud Abbas rejected and the withdrawal from Gaza that turned that area into a terrorist state, how can any American speak as if Israel has stood pat all this time rather than, as the historical record proves, taken terrible risks for which it has gotten little reward?

The Panetta visit is meant to reassure the Israelis who are understandably worried about the way in which the Arab Spring has led to more hate for the Jewish state rather than democracy for the Arabs. It is an unfortunate fact that there is nothing Israel can do to repair relations with countries like Turkey and Egypt, whose governments are whipping up antagonism for reasons that have little to do with the policies of the Netanyahu government. As dangerous as this is, it is the helplessness of the United States in the face of these trends that is most troubling.

President Obama came into office hoping to curry favor with the Arab and Muslim world by distancing the United States from Israel. While that policy shift helped fuel Palestinian intransigence and doomed the already slim hopes for Middle East peace, it did nothing to make America loved. But as the situation in the region deteriorates, Obama still has no answers other than to blame Israel and to demand it take “risks.”

While it is to be hoped Panetta will reaffirm the U.S. security cooperation with Israel that has survived Obama’s predilection for picking fights with Netanyahu, there is reason to worry the administration is looking to set the stage for a new round of pressure on the prime minister. Despite the pledges that the United States will work to preserve Israel’s military edge over its hostile neighbors, the timing of the visit may mean Washington is looking to demand payment for its veto of Palestinian independence at the United Nations.

But even if Netanyahu were to make the concessions on settlements and Jerusalem that Obama wants, there is little reason to believe the Palestinian Authority is interested in signing any peace deal. Rather than muscling Israel, the administration needs to make it clear to the Palestinian Authority, whom Panetta is said to be hoping to “re-engage,” that they cannot continue to be the beneficiaries of American largesse while at the same time doing everything in their power to torpedo the peace process.

Weakening Israel or creating the impression the United States is seeking to undermine its government only makes it less likely the Palestinians and other nations in the region will work for peace. By arriving in the region demanding Israel take “risks” they have already undertaken, rather than making it clear to the PA they will get nothing from their refusal to talk, Panetta has only ensured the standoff will continue.

Not all was bad though.  Panetta reaffirmed the U.S.' committment to a secure Israel and a stable country in the everchanging Middle East.

The most important thing I bring with me is the continuing commitment to the security of Israel. We have been strong allies, we have been strong partners. We have always made a commitment to do everything we can to support the security of Israel and as the Secretary of Defense, I intend to continue that commitment. I think it's important for us to say to this region that when it comes to the difficult issues we face we stand together to try to confront our difficult and common challenges.